LivaraPrivate messenger, home
English

Privacy guides

Livara vs SimpleX, Signal, Session & Threema

Choose a messenger around your contacts, devices and threat model. This comparison separates account requirements from message encryption. Features and beta availability can change; consult the linked official documentation before deciding.

Content reviewed ·

Livara vs SimpleX, Signal, Session & Threema
CriterionLivara ChatSimpleX ChatSignalSessionThreema
Registration and identifiersNo phone number; username, password and verified email.No phone number or global user identifier; connection-specific addresses.Standard registration uses a phone number; Android beta also documents paid phone-free Signal Login with an account ID.No phone number or email; generated Account ID.Generated Threema ID; linking phone or email is optional.
Message encryptionLVR1 hybrid P-256 + ML-KEM-768; LGS1 private groups.End-to-end encrypted conversations with per-connection keys.Signal Protocol; published hybrid post-quantum key agreement and ratchet specifications.End-to-end encryption; see current protocol documentation for version-specific guarantees.End-to-end encryption; documented Ibex protocol for one-to-one conversations.
Metadata modelCentral service processes account, participant and delivery metadata.No global user IDs; separate relay queues reduce linkability.Central service with metadata-reduction mechanisms including sealed sender.Decentralized onion routing separates origin and destination visibility.Contact lists and groups managed on devices; service still handles delivery.
Group messagingEncrypted private groups; public broadcasts have different boundaries.End-to-end encrypted groups.End-to-end encrypted groups.Encrypted private groups; public broadcasts have different boundaries.End-to-end encrypted groups.
PlatformsAndroid beta and web.Android, iOS and desktop clients.Android, iOS and desktop clients.Android, iOS and desktop clients.Android and iOS; desktop/web availability depends on client version.
Source and verificationPrivate application source; public architecture and release hashes. No published independent audit is established here.Open source; published security assessments linked by SimpleX.Open-source clients and protocol specifications; inspect the scope of any independent research separately.Open source; its FAQ links a Quarkslab audit with a defined historical scope.Open-source mobile clients; published external audits with version-specific scope.

An audit or open-source license is not a guarantee of security. Compare the reviewed version, scope, unresolved findings and your own needs. Livara publishes this comparison as the product's maker.